The Gravel Pit

Thoughts on SF

Reaper’s Gale by Steven Erikson (Bantam Press)

Posted by lawrence89 on July 1, 2007

Reaper’s Gale Coverart
As a huge lover of the books written by Steven Erikson, I was eager to get my hands on the copy of Reaper’s Gale, the seventh volume in the epic series ‘A Tale of Malazan Book of the Fallen’. Especially the first three books had such a grip on me, that I could not lay them down, I read the second installment ‘Deadhouse Gates’ in two days for example. Unfortunately, the books have dwindled in quality since then, the same can be said of his latest book. At the end of the Bonehunters, there were many questions left unanswered, so picking up the book I felt that pang of anticipation, hoping those plotlines would be picked up and continued in great fashion.After book six, we have this large set of forces, massing together in the capital of the Lether, Letheras. Knowing that Erikson is at his best in those large-scale battles, this book could only be thrilling. Yet, Erikson pulled off the very opposite.If you wanted to quickly summarize the situation at the start of the seventh book, it would be like this (potential Bonehunters spoilers!):

Icarium, companied by Taralack Veed and Karsa Orlong, companied by the witch Samar Dev arrive in the capital Letheras. Rhulad Sengar, Emperor the Lether continent (with the exception of a few remote areas) is still pretty much in charge, albeit isolated from his own people, the Tiste Edur. Tehol and Bugg are in good shape, continuing there grand scheme. Fear Sengar has fled out of Letheras, in the company of Seren Pedac, Udinaas, Kettle and the now free ascendant Silchas Ruin. Meanwhile Trull, Onrack and Quick Ben are recuperating in the realm of Shadow. The outcasts of the Malazan Empire, the Fourteenth Army, also named ‘the Bonehunters’ come to pay a visit to Letheras and its Emperor of Thousand Deaths.

Without spoiling the events in Reaper’s Gale, it can be said that this book is not Steven Erikson’s best book by far. Overall, his writing style has improved; the writing feels very natural and flows in a smooth way. Yet the book seems to suffer from a ‘filler-ish’ kind of structure, about 200 to 300 pages could have been cut out resulting in the same sort of ending. For instance, Steven Erikson sets up a new plotline, but in the aftermath when the plotline is ‘resolved’ it all seems very pointless and actually ends in an anti-climax. It is in many ways characteristic of the book; it has great potential but in the end, Erikson makes a most peculiar choice twisting the plotline, leaving the reader rather disappointed with the result.

In addition to the various ‘plot holes’, the balance of power shifts continually and this causes a lot of confusion. Ascendants are not as powerful as their ‘legacy’ suggests, and mere mortals are able to bring them down with the help of some magic or explosives.

Also, the death of a mortal seems be by no means final (unless Hood comes to claim its soul himself), as Erikson always has some resurrection up his sleeve. In that sense, I think Erikson uses the ‘deus-ex-machina’ a bit too much and this affects the realism of the story overall.

The Tehol and Bugg storyline takes a darker turn and it does seem to suffer from that, the typical humor of the two is not as present as one would have liked.

Yet, if you are willing to believe some few unexpected twists and are not bothered by a loosely plotted novel, Erikson still has the goods to offer. His way of describing tactics in battles is still unprecedented amongst other (fantasy) authors and the Malazan’s invasion of Letheras is one brimming with adventure. Many characters seem to grow more in their role, like Fiddler, Bottle, Tarr, Koryk, Smiles and (the weird if hilarious) Hellian. The way in which the Fourteenth conducts their business is very reminiscent of the Bridgeburners, and likewise has that same sort of vibe as the first three books had.

So in all, I was not impressed as much as I hoped with this novel, nonetheless it is a good effort and manages to build up anticipation (once again) for the next one, Toll of Hounds, set in the areas known as Darujhistan and Black Coral. Therefore, I would rate it:

7 out of 10

7 Responses to “Reaper’s Gale by Steven Erikson (Bantam Press)”

  1. Mephidro said

    WARNING!! SPOILERS AHEAD!!!!!

    Small things I disagreed with

    Ascendants are not as powerful as their ‘legacy’ suggests, and mere mortals are able to bring them down with the help of some magic or explosives.

    Quick Ben aint a mere mortal with some magic, I think that you dont give him enough credit there. Besides that, the ascendants he hurt didnt where kinda arrogant in their approach and the explosive only blasted the ascendant apart after he was down on the ground and almost dead anyway.

    Also, the death of a mortal seems be by no means final (unless Hood comes to claim its soul himself), as Erikson always has some resurrection up his sleeve.

    Only Brys? Or do you have other examples? Cause the way you say it makes it sound as if nobody dies…

    Anyway, maybe it wasnt as good as others, tbh, I couldnt tell. I enjoyed the book a lot, was happy with every plottwist as well. But I aint a reader who demands a lot :)

    So, nice review, but I tend to disagree XD

  2. lawrence89 said

    Thanks for responding to my review. :)
    ” Quick Ben aint a mere mortal with some magic, I think that you dont give him enough credit there. Besides that, the ascendants he hurt didnt where kinda arrogant in their approach and the explosive only blasted the ascendant apart after he was down on the ground and almost dead anyway. ”
    It’s true that Quick Ben is in fact far more powerful than he appears to be, ie. he’s at least as strong as a High Mage. Also, I did notice the small hints Erikson dropped, about QB feeling more ’stretched out’. Still, the problem lies in the fact that Erikson shows us in a couple of situations how cunning/powerful these Ascendants are, they seem to be in control. Then when an Ascendant visits the party including QB, he’s driven off quite easily with some Moranth munitions, and sorcery. Surely an Ascendant would have been prepared for that? With all the earlier describings of his/their prowess, the reader has some kind expectation, hoping it will come to a big clash between these forces. But then, when the Ascedant is taken down/driven off quite casually, Eriksons actually manages to crush these expectations. Compare it to a sports game, let’s say the great boxer Mike Tyson, heavyweight champion of reknown, versus and small, yet strong guy. The fight starts, everybody is excited, yet what happens is that Mike Tyson is knocked out first round. Feels like an anti-climax of what should have been a great fight..
    “Only Brys? Or do you have other examples? Cause the way you say it makes it sound as if nobody dies…”
    I was also referring to the resurrection of Hedge, Onrack getting his ‘flesh and bones’ again. Really, I wouldn’t even be surprised if Toc played some sort of role in the future in the storyline. Also, the adcendancy of the Bridgeburners is could be considered as an ‘resurrection’ after they were wiped out in Memories of Ice. Same goes for Coltaine. Just seem to me that Erikson has a hard time letting his characters die.

  3. Chuck said

    I agree with your review. I picked up “Reaper’s Gale” preparing to be (excuse the pun) blown away. I wasn’t.

    1 – Doesn’t it say on the back of the book that Icarium is “destined to cross blades with the emperor”? Oops. Maybe he’ll do…nothing…and then wander off into a magical portal and vanish.

    2 – Karsa’s big fight with Rhulad: boring. Hasn’t *any* champion thought to cut off the big R’s sword arm while he was temporarily dead?

    3 – Silchas Ruin. Two possible translations of his name: A) “anti-climax”. B) “paper tiger”. I think Clip could have taken him.

    4 – Feather Witch. What a waste. Yet we get endless resurections for characters like Hedge and Brys, whom Erikson likes but most readers despise.

    5 – Tehol & Bugg, Kruppe, etc…did someone let David Eddings write a few chapters? Not my kind of humor.

    Anyway…maybe the next book will be better?

    Best 3 quotes from Reaper’s Gale:

    #3 – “god of mine, I compel you!” – Feather Witch.
    #2 – “Witness!” – Karsa.
    #1 – “F*cking dragons!” – Fiddler.

  4. lawrence89 said

    Don’t really think Clip could have taken him, in a sense Clip is just as well an anti-climax, only snapping his chain and such. I think Ruin tolerated him because he needed him to be a guide. As for Tehol & Bugg pieces, well the humor seemed to suffer a bit but I think them just being in action was worth a lot and made up for some stuff. Not completely, Midnight Tides was superior in terms of quality of the Tehol & Bugg parts, but I was not so bad. I hate Feather Witch too, by the way.
    The Fiddler quote was awesome, but as I said the Feather Witch chapters were tiresome and connecting her to the Errant was a bad move (pun intended).

    Thanks for commenting, love the feedback.

  5. Trevor said

    As a huge Erikson fan, I have to agree with the review, it wasn’t his best work especially because of the Redmask plotline. I have to think that is going to come back into play and we’ll find out what the hell it was doing in the book in the first place. I felt the same way about the Tehol/Bugg storyline after Midnight Tides and that was cleared up here so I’ll give S.E. the benefit of the doubt.

    As for the resurrections, they don’t really bother me, I actually kind of like them because you never know what’s going to happen or who is going to show up where. Coltaine isn’t coming back though and neither is Whiskeyjack, SE has confirmed this.

  6. lawrence89 said

    I thought Whiskeyjack had some sort of part to play, apparently he did not? Not something in the same vein as Hedge?

    As for the rest, I give Erikson the benefit of the doubt as well, (still immensely looking forward to Toll the Hounds!) as the next one is set in Genebackis again. Genebackis is/was always my favorite continent.

    Thanks for dropping by, Trevor. Much appreciated.

  7. Andrew said

    I realize this is kind of an archaic thread here, so if no-one ever reads it, oh well. ^_^
    I just have a quick comment on the anti-climaxes.

    I think Erikson does those often and wholly intentionally, one of his major themes – at least in this book – being arrogance, especially displayed in the elder races: e.g. Scabandari-Silchas Ruin, the Tiste Liosan, Menandore and her sisters, the Crippled God, Rhulad, etc. Also, specifically the Eleint are used to being on top, but the food chain’s become a lot more complex while they’ve been lounging in Azath Houses and whatnot for the last few thousand years. I found the counter-intuitive climaxes rather poignant in that regard, myself.

    Oh, also, the Redmask plot (which I do suspect has some as yet unrevealed significance) slaps Tool in the face, hard, for presuming to take vengeance against the Awl.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>